Hinterrhein-Bridge

 

The second Hinterrhein-bridge, designed by the joint venture WaltGalmarini AG - COWI UK together with Danish architect Dissing & Weitling and local landscape architect Hager Partner, was officially inaugurated near Reichenau-Tamins (GR) in mid-October 2018. The 200m long steel bridge complements the more than 100 years old truss bridge. After the renovation of the old bridge, a further bottleneck in the rail network of the Rhaetian Railway (RhB) will be eliminated and the two bridges allow an undisturbed two-line service.

On 18.10.2018, the load tests before opening of the bridge were carried out by WaltGalmarini AG , Schneider Ingenieure AG and the Rhaetian Railway. During these load tests, the Chair of Geosensors and Engineering Geodesy (GSEG) got the chance to apply and evaluate new bridge monitoring methods based on terrestrial laser scanning (TLS).
 

Ungoing load test with two locomotives (Picture: R. Sidler, WaltGalmarini AG)
Ungoing load test with two locomotives (Picture: R. Sidler, WaltGalmarini AG)
The laser scanner exactly positioned beneath the second load position (Picture: L. Schmid, ETH Zürich)
The laser scanner exactly positioned beneath the second load position (Picture: L. Schmid, ETH Zürich)

The tests were performed in two phases. In the first phase, two locomotives were placed at three different specific positions representing where the behavior of the bridge could be captured with measurable deformations. The deck was observed with precise levelling by Schneider Ingenieure AG and GSEG captured the bottom surface of the structure using three 3D scanners. This allowed determining the areal deformation under all three load situations and get a large-scale picture of the bridge behavior. A comparison of the levelling results and the analysis based on TLS shows excellent agreement of the two methods with deviations on the order of 1.4 mm (rms). In contrast to the traditional levelling, which only allows analyzing for vertical deformation of the deck, the TLS data facilitate a variety of analyses showing 3d deformations of various parts of the bridge. In particular, we could perform an analysis of the twist of the deck, of crossbeam deformations and of deformations of the pillars. All this supports a more comprehensive assessment of the structural stiffness.
 

The tests were performed in two phases. In the first phase, two locomotives were placed at three different specific positions representing where the behavior of the bridge could be captured with measurable deformations. The deck was observed with precise levelling by Schneider Ingenieure AG and GSEG captured the bottom surface of the structure using three 3D scanners. This allowed determining the areal deformation under all three load situations and get a large-scale picture of the bridge behavior. A comparison of the levelling results and the analysis based on TLS shows excellent agreement of the two methods with deviations on the order of 1.4 mm (rms). In contrast to the traditional levelling, which only allows analyzing for vertical deformation of the deck, the TLS data facilitate a variety of analyses showing 3d deformations of various parts of the bridge. In particular, we could perform an analysis of the twist of the deck, of crossbeam deformations and of deformations of the pillars. All this supports a more comprehensive assessment of the structural stiffness.

 

Overall vertical deformation combined from three laser scans. (Picture: L. Schmid, ETH Zürich)
Overall vertical deformation combined from three laser scans. (Picture: L. Schmid, ETH Zürich)

In the second phase, quasi-static tests were carried out with one locomotive moving over the entire bridge at walking pace. While Schneider Ingenieure AG monitored the displacement of two prisms continuously tracked using two total stations, we captured the temporal evolution of the deformation along an entire longitudinal profile of the bridge by observing three consecutive runs of the locomotive with one laser scanner operating in 2D profile mode. The captured time series could be analyzed with respect to the approximately known positions of the moving locomotive allowing to study the response of the bridge to the spatially and temporally varying load situation.
 

Contact

Lorenz Schmid
  • HIL D 46.3
  • +41 44 633 05 28

Geosensorik und Ingenieurgeodäsie
Stefano-Franscini-Platz 5
8093 Zürich
Switzerland

JavaScript has been disabled in your browser