Spatially continuous dam monitoring

A healthy dam deforms constantly due to the impacting forces of the water level of the reservoir, thermal expansion of the construction material, and other factors. However, small anomalies in this deformation process can be an indication of problems that may result in structural and economic damage. Dam surveillance plays therefore a key role in ensuring safe and uninterrupted dam operation, whereas areal monitoring is key for comprehensive monitoring.

Enlarged view: Figure 1
Figure 1: Terrestrial radar setup in front of the Schiffenen hydropower dam

Terrestrial Radar Interferometry (TRI), which is based on microwave signals, can observe a large area within a short time (less than a few minutes per acquisition), along with very high precision (< 1 mm). These properties make TRI especially interesting for investigating spatially distributed, time-variable effects with low amplitudes as are e.g. vital for deformation monitoring of dams. By monitoring the entire dam, the aforementioned anomalies may be detected with higher probability as compared to a monitoring approach based on sparsely chosen points. Additionally, TRI may allow monitoring also the nearby slopes and thus assessing its stability.

Enlarged view: Figure 2
Figure 2: Deformation observed by TRI mapped on digital surface model

However, practical application of TRI to dam monitoring beyond research is still impeded by open issues related to uncertainties in the reproducing the acquisition geometry for multi-epoch observations, geometric effects due to different setups, discrepancies between the line-of-sight (LoS) sensing and the directions of the dominant or relevant deformation processes, signal propagation effects, and atmospheric influences within the local meteorological regime.

In a first step, we are currently investigating the impact of the uncertainties of the setup geometry and possible mitigation strategies. Once we can solve the ambiguities introduced, the focus will be on the assessment of atmospheric variables and the mitigation of them. Finally, we plan to assess setup location-specific effects and propose a strategy to optimize the setup with respect to sensitivity and mitigation of detrimental effects.

Enlarged view: Figure 3
Figure 3: Impressions from TLS-based dam monitoring

In collaboration with dam owners we also investigate the benefits and challenges for areal dam monitoring based on terrestrial laser scanning (TLS), where main challenges are, again, the sufficiently accurate establishment of a common datum by point cloud registration and/or georeferencing, appropriate geometrical configuration for obtaining sufficient sensitivity, and mitigation of atmospheric effects. On the other hand, the RGB- and intensity data provided by the scanner, along with the capability to also map terrain changes at the lake side including along the edge of the lake offers highly interesting opportunities for TLS-based dam monitoring to complement established geodetic monitoring.

Contact

Lorenz Schmid
  • HIL D 46.3
  • +41 44 633 05 28
  • vCard Download

Geosensorik und Ingenieurgeodäsie
Stefano-Franscini-Platz 5
8093 Zürich
Switzerland

JavaScript has been disabled in your browser